library futures idea
library design visual

Transforming Libraries and Education: Blueprint for Community-Centered Learning Spaces

The question “How can you transform a library?” arrives at a pivotal moment in our collective understanding of what libraries can and must become. Drawing from extensive research and post-pandemic insights, we’re witnessing a fundamental shift from libraries as book repositories to libraries as dynamic catalysts for community transformation.

Recent OCLC Research findings reveal that library leaders worldwide have identified four critical dimensions of change: agility, collaboration, virtualization, and space (OCLC Research, 2021). These aren’t just operational adjustments—they represent a our evolution in how we conceive of academic and local educational institutions. As Connaway and colleagues note, “The pandemic has accelerated changes that were already underway, forcing libraries to reimagine their service models and organizational structures” (Connaway et al., 2021, p. 12). We have developed models to support the transformation of library spaces and the utilization of those spaces. The simple genius of value creation is that everyone benefits.

Qualitative and Quantitative Space Utilization Studies

As I reimagine the purpose of qualitative and quantitative space utilization studies, I find that the assumptions that we made are starting to become reality. Before entering a library now, I reflect on how we can continue to build skills including math, writing and sciences at the library. So before any physical or digital transformation can occur, we must first challenge our fundamental assumptions about library purpose. The ACRL Standards for Higher Education emphasize an outcomes-based approach (Association of College & Research Libraries, 2018), but transformative libraries must go further: they must become living laboratories for community potential. They need to provide community using both physical and digital tools. This paradigm shift requires moving from service provider to community co-creator, transforming neutral spaces into sites of active engagement.

Mission of Librarians is to Improve Society

As Lankes argues in The Atlas of New Librarianship, “The mission of librarians is to improve society through facilitating knowledge creation in their communities” (Lankes, 2011, p. 15). Once you’ve identified a broad list of space options, the next step is to understand the service priorities. Every multi-issue plan requires you to make trade-offs.

Library Architecture

Here is where the Architecture of Possible Starts. Indeed, Space Utilization Studies are based on the possible. There are two main reasons: First, we need to update the spaces to make them more attractive. Cleaning up spaces makes a big difference and new furniture transforms the experience. Second, space use functions change overtime and buildings are not always flexible without creative ideas and plans.

What should be considered when taking a new approach? Do you start with strategic planning and best practices? Our workshops on library planning requires what I call “possibility mapping”—understanding not just how spaces are used, but how they could catalyze unexpected connections and innovations.

library futures idea
library design visual

The Learning Spaces guide by EDUCAUSE demonstrates that effective space design must consider the psychology of learning environments and human-centered design principles (Brown & Lippincott, 2003). Key components of possibility mapping include:

  • Observational Ethnography: Beyond counting bodies, observe interaction quality and identify psychologically inaccessible spaces
  • Temporal Analysis: Map community rhythms to understand when different populations need different services
  • Desire Path Documentation: Document where communities attempt to create connections that current designs prevent
  • Digital Physical Convergence

    Over my career, the Digital-Physical convergence has made a big impact on libraries. Instantly creating value by updating the user experience of the library spaces and supporting the community by providing the types of spaces and services needed. The tech-driven innovations documented in recent research point toward a future where digital and physical experiences are impactfully interwoven. This isn’t about choosing between media and in-person—library space. Its about creating hybrid knowledge ecosystems (Cox, 2021).

    Uniquely, Stanford University’s GroupSpaces exemplify this convergence, integrating collaborative software with physical design to enhance group learning and community building (EDUCAUSE, 2006). Today Libraries must consider implementing physical interfaces, augmented reality wayfinding, and digital library twins that allow full remote engagement in library programs. Just think there is a road-blocks library that you can visit anytime in the virtual world. There are a lot of tools in virtual worlds already.

    Despite our best efforts community development needs to be interwoven into your planning. The ball is now in the communities court-and its the responsibility of the library staff and operations to support the growth of sharing communities. This is a most profound challenge we face – staffing. Basically, staffing is part of the user experience engine. It is how communities build capacity and building are used.

    ACRL Framework

    The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy emphasizes that students must become “active contributors to scholarly conversations” (Association of College & Research Libraries, 2015). This principle must extend beyond academia to encompass entire communities. Most importantly, this is why libraries are so powerful, indicating the education funds would best be spent on independent learning buildings, spaces, services and programs.

    Libraries can Transition

    Libraries can transition from passive gatekeepers to knowledge facilitators, implementing community knowledge systems that document local expertise and establish research partnerships addressing community challenges. Instead of investing in programs without an impact; think about how libraries can provide impactful spaces and personnel.

    The Library Consultant Roadmap

    The Library Consultant Roadmap is a practical workshopping method that we used for years. Basically, it is a little bit of tracing paper and the plans. It is developing a pathway to start data gathering. It includes four phases: Deep Visualizing (community interviews and aspiration mapping), Prototype and Demo (pop-up experiments and documented tours of library spaces), Systems Integration (digital workspace, tech infrastructure, alignment and role redesign), and Continuous Library Planning Evolution (create a library master plan, and develop sustainable funding models).

    The Investments

    Libraries provide infrastructure that is more fruitful when there are projects to get investments. Our library development vision is to simply propose that our youth will be served better with more and more libraries and community spaces that support knowledge and skills building. What’s at stake in library transformation isn’t just better services or efficient spaces. As Palfrey notes in BiblioTech, “Libraries are not merely warehouses for books; they are crucial to our democratic society” (Palfrey, 2015, p. 7). In transforming libraries, we’re reimagining the social infrastructure that makes democratic society possible.

    Experimentation

    The evidence from tech innovations shows what’s possible when we embrace courageous experimentation. Libraries can become innovation labs, cultural bridges, and future-making spaces. The question isn’t whether to transform libraries, but whether we’re bold enough to transform them into what our communities need them to become.

    References

    Association of College & Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association.

    Association of College & Research Libraries. (2018). Standards for libraries in higher education. American Library Association.

    Brown, M., & Lippincott, J. (2003). Learning spaces: More than meets the eye. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 26(1), 14-16.

    Connaway, L. S., Doyle, B., & Cyr, C. (2021). The new model library: Pandemic effects and library directions. OCLC Research.

    Cox, A. M. (2021). Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 102350.

    EDUCAUSE. (2006). Learning spaces. EDUCAUSE.

    Lankes, R. D. (2011). The atlas of new librarianship. MIT Press.

    OCLC Research. (2021). New model library: Pandemic effects and library directions. OCLC.

    Palfrey, J. (2015). BiblioTech: Why libraries matter more than ever in the age of Google. Basic Books.